
Sharp LC46LE820X vs Sharp LC46LE700X LED (in Australia)?
The 820X retails $300 more and for that you get “Quattron” – four primary color technology.
Is it worth paying the extra?
Is there any reason for not buying Sharp?
I was thinking Sony Bravia but Sharp gets better reviews for picture quality.
Is there more risk because Sharp is the only one to have a fully backlit LED TV and therefore very new technology?
only reason not to buy Sharp TV is ” name ” not great than Sony and Samsung . you friends may said Sony better !
Sharp is the very first Japan electronics manufactures invest to LCD display technology since 1960 from small LCD display for calculator.. Sharp master LCD display technology more than other as Sharp is Japan biggest LCD /LED display panel manufactures. all Sharp TV use own made display panel .
Sony big screen LCD TV ( 46 inc and above ) and all LED TV use Sharp Japan made display panel. some new models after July 2010 may use Sharp-Sony joint Venture display panel.
http://hd.engadget.com/2008/02/23/your-next-sony-lcd-tv-may-actually-be-a-sharp/
http://techon.nikkeibp.co.jp/article/HONSHI/20080327/149601/
if you know Sony big screen LCD and all LED TV use Sharp display panel. you will believe Sharp quality and why Sony cannot be better that Sharp !
” quattron ” is really NICE in colour display.* i view the display unit * .
the only ” risk ” is prices , a little high as this moment.
usually any new technology need ” refine ” after 6 – 12 months.
of course , if you budget allow and looking for the best as this moment, enjoy it ! 300 more is worth for it , in return for better quality . keep in mind, if you side by side compare ” quattron ” with other LED TV, you eye select ” QUATTRON ‘. because you eye able to get the difference .

